
The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
We are the final court of appeal in the UK for civil cases, and for criminal cases from England, Wales and Northern Ireland. The Supreme Court hears cases of the greatest public or constitutional importance affecting the whole population.
The Court is closed for the weekend
LISTINGS
Upcoming
- AXA Insurance UK PLC and another (Appellants) v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and another (Respondents)
UK Supreme Court
Hearing
18 November 2025
Lord Hodge,
Lord Hamblen,
Lord Leggatt,
Lady Rose,
Lord Richards
Was the Court of Appeal correct to hold that (A) whether the claims are time-barred has not been finally determined in the Prudential test case, and should be determined in the present proceedings by applying the law as it stands now (“Limitation Issue”); (B) GREA is not entitled to a claim in restitution for payment of unlawful advance corporation tax utilised against lawful tax or repaid before the issue of its claim (“Set-off Issue”); and (C) by 1 April 2010, the Appellants had not pleaded a claim in restitution for the recovery of unlawful tax paid as a result of their inability to offset unused double taxation relief credit (“Pleading Issue”)?
- R v BDN (Appellant)
UK Supreme Court
Hearing
20 November 2025
Lord Reed,
Lord Sales,
Lord Hamblen,
Lord Burrows,
Lord Richards
(1) Do the terms of s.12(1A) of the Terrorism Act 2000 (“the TA”) represent a disproportionate interference with the appellants’ rights under article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”)? In the event that they do, is it possible to read down the terms of the offence to render them compatible? (2) What is the mental element in relation to the offence under s.12(1A)?
Linked cases
Legal Issue
- Dairy UK Ltd (Respondent) v Oatly AB (Appellant)
UK Supreme Court
Hearing
10 December 2025
Lord Hodge,
Lord Briggs,
Lord Hamblen,
Lord Burrows,
Lord Stephens
Was the Court of Appeal wrong to hold that Oatly AB could not validly register POST MILK GENERATION as a trade mark as this was prohibited under Article 78(2) and Part III of Annex VII of EU Regulation 1308/2013?
- Orsted West of Duddon Sands (UK) Limited and others (Respondents) v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Appellant)
UK Supreme Court
Hearing
3 February 2026
Whether expenditure incurred on studies used to inform the development of wind farms falls within the scope of “qualifying expenditure” for the purposes of the Capital Allowances Act 2001.
- Tesla, Inc and another (Appellants) v Interdigital Patent Holdings and others (Respondents)
UK Supreme Court
Hearing
27 April 2026
Do the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction to determine disputes as to what licence terms are fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory at the request of an implementor rather than a patent owner, where the licence is offered by an intermediary as part of a pool or platform of patents?
THINGS TO DO

Take a tour of the Court
We offer a range of tours to suit individuals and groups, including in-person and virtual tours.
Exhibitions and events
Find out what's on, including our permanent exhibition about the history and work of the Court.
Our cafe
The UK Supreme Court cafe is open to the public Monday to Friday between 9am and 4pm.
NEWS
Latest judgments
•
1 August 2025
Latest judgments
Latest judgments
Future judgments
•
25 July 2025
Future Judgments
Future judgments
Corporate updates
•
14 July 2025
UK Supreme Court publishes its Annual Report & Accounts 2024-25
Today (14th July 2025) the UK Supreme Court has laid its Annual Report & Accounts 2024-25 (ARA) before Parliament.
SPEECHES
LATEST JUDGMENTS
1 August 2025
Hopcraft and another (Respondents) v Close Brothers Limited (Appellant)- Wrench (Respondent) v FirstRand Bank Limited (London Branch) t/a MotoNovo Finance (Appellant)
- Johnson (Respondent) v FirstRand Bank Limited (London Branch) t/a MotoNovo Finance (Appellant)
30 July 2025
Wathen-Fayed (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (Respondents)29 July 2025
D.E.L.T.A. Merseyside Limited and another (Respondents) v Uber Britannia Limited (Appellant)