Visit JCPCAll cases
1399 Cases
UKSC/2024/0146
•
COMMERCIAL
WithdrawnCase summary:(1) What is the true scope of, and the proper limits on, the statutory power of the FCA to impose a single-firm redress requirement under s.55L of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (“FSMA”)? (2) What is the scope of the jurisdiction of the Upper Tribunal, on a reference under FSMA, to allow the Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”) to depart by amendment from the case it has put to a regulated firm in its decision and/or supervisory notices?
Last updated: 9 October 2025
UKSC/2025/0042
•
DEVOLUTION
Hearing listedCase summary:Does the Minister of Health for Northern Ireland have the power to revise the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards Code of Practice (“the Code”) so that persons aged 16 and over who lack capacity to make decisions about their care and treatment can give valid consent to their confinement through the expression of their wishes and feelings?
Last updated: 9 October 2025
UKSC/2025/0174
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 9 October 2025
UKSC/2024/0065
•
TAX
Judgment givenCase summary:Is the effect of section 43 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 that no VAT is chargeable on an intra-group supply of services even where the supplier has left the group by the time consideration for the supply is the subject of a VAT invoice and paid?
Last updated: 8 October 2025
UKSC/2024/1003
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Hearing listedCase summary:The correct interpretation of sections 6(4) and 11(3) of the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973 (as prior to amendments made by the Prescription Act 2018)
Last updated: 8 October 2025
UKSC/2025/0013/A
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Case summary:Linked casesLast updated: 8 October 2025
UKSC/2025/0013
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Hearing listedCase summary:In summary, did the Court of Appeal err by holding that: (1) The trial judge at first instance was entitled to disapply provisions of the Legacy Act under Article 2(1) of the Windsor Framework (and the related EU and Treaty mechanisms); (2) The trial judge was wrong to find no violation of the European Convention of Human Rights ("ECHR") with respect to the ability of the Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery (“ICRIR”) to comply with its obligations under the ECHR.
Linked casesLast updated: 8 October 2025
UKSC/2025/0121
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Permission to Appeal refusedCase summary:(1) Should the Administrative Court have held an oral hearing to reconsider the decision of an Administrative Court Officer Lawyer made on the papers to refuse the appellant’s application to expedite his judicial review claim? (2) Did the Court of Appeal have jurisdiction to hear the appellant’s appeal against the Administrative Court’s failure to list an oral hearing?
Last updated: 8 October 2025
UKSC/2025/0058/A
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 7 October 2025
UKSC/2024/0117
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Awaiting JudgmentCase summary:When, if ever, should a court make an award of costs in a foreign currency?
Last updated: 7 October 2025
UKSC/2025/0152
•
TAX
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:What is the test for ascertaining the place of effective management (“POEM”) of a company for the purposes of Article 4(3) of the 1981 double taxation treaty (“the Treaty”) between the UK and Mauritius? Is “residence” for the purpose of the taxability of capital gains (“CGT”) within Article 13(4) of the Treaty to be assessed at the time of “alienation” of the relevant assets, or by reference to the relevant tax year during which the gain occurs?
Last updated: 7 October 2025
UKSC/2025/0159
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal err in its construction of s58AA(3)(a) of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 (the “1990 Act”), by holding that the respondents’ revised litigation funding agreements and related agreements did not provide for an amount payable to the funder that “is to be determined by reference to the financial benefit obtained”?
Linked casesLast updated: 7 October 2025
UKSC/2025/0158
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal err in its construction of s58AA(3)(a) of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 (the “1990 Act”), by holding that the respondents’ revised litigation funding agreements and related agreements did not provide for an amount payable to the funder that “is to be determined by reference to the financial benefit obtained”?
Linked casesLast updated: 7 October 2025
UKSC/2025/0151
•
COMMERCIAL
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Is the Respondent a “financial institution” capable of being assigned loans and security rights within the terms of this loan agreement?
Last updated: 7 October 2025
UKSC/2025/0153
•
COMMERCIAL
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:In deciding whether to grant permission to appeal from the Competition Appeal Tribunal in respect of the unfair price charged for a generic medicine, did the Court of Appeal err in failing to admit new evidence as to the price at which the drug had sold after the Tribunal’s hearing?
Last updated: 7 October 2025
Sign up for case email alerts
Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.