
The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
We are the final court of appeal in the UK for civil cases, and for criminal cases from England, Wales and Northern Ireland. The Supreme Court hears cases of the greatest public or constitutional importance affecting the whole population.
The Court is closed for the weekend
LISTINGS
Upcoming
- Iconix Luxembourg Holdings SARL (Respondent) v Dream Pairs Europe Inc. and another (Appellants)
UK Supreme Court
Hearing
17 March 2025
Lord Hodge,
Lord Briggs,
Lord Hamblen,
Lord Stephens,
Lady Rose
Was the Court of Appeal right to conclude the trial judge’s conclusion on the similarity of logos was “rationally insupportable”? At what point of time should the confusion of consumers be assessed in a claim for trade mark infringement? What approach should the court take when assessing whether trade marks are similar?
- Kattina Anglin (Appellant) v Governor of the Cayman Islands (Respondent) Cayman Islands)
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Hearing
18 March 2025
Lord Reed,
Lord Lloyd-Jones,
Lord Burrows,
Lady Simler,
Dame Janice Pereira
Did the Governor of the Cayman Islands have the power by reason of section 81 of the Cayman Islands Constitution Order 2009 (the “Constitution”) to enact the Civil Partnership Law 2020? If not, what is the appropriate relief?
- Rubis Bahamas Ltd (Appellant) v Lillian Antionette Russell (Respondent) (The Bahamas)
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Judgment
18 March 2025
Lord Lloyd-Jones,
Lord Briggs,
Lord Hamblen,
Lord Stephens,
Lady Rose,
Lord Richards,
Lady Simler
(1) Can claims for unliquidated damages exceeding $4,000 give rise to appeals to the JCPC as of right under section 23(1) of the Bahamas Court of Appeal Act (the “CA Act”)? (2) Does the rule in Rylands v Fletcher impose strict liability on a landowner and lessor who neither occupies the land, nor owns or controls the dangerous thing? (3) Is the storage of fuel underground a “non-natural use of land” for the purposes of the rule in Rylands v Fletcher?
- Rukhadze and others (Appellants) v Recovery Partners GP Ltd and another (Respondents)
UK Supreme Court
Judgment
19 March 2025
Lord Reed,
Lord Hodge,
Lord Briggs,
Lord Leggatt,
Lord Burrows,
Lady Rose,
Lord Richards
Whether the current test for an account of profits (where a fiduciary has to pay back money earned due to a breach of a duty) should be changed to introduce a requirement that the fiduciary could not have made the same profit in a way that avoided a breach of duty, i.e. to introduce a test that asks: ‘Could the same profit have been made but for the breach of fiduciary duty’?
- The Prudential Assurance Company Ltd (Appellant) v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Respondent)
UK Supreme Court
Hearing
19 March 2025
Lord Reed,
Lord Hodge,
Lord Lloyd-Jones,
Lord Stephens,
Lady Rose,
Lord Richards,
Lady Simler
Is the effect of section 43 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 that no VAT is chargeable on an intra-group supply of services even where the supplier has left the group by the time consideration for the supply is the subject of a VAT invoice and paid?
THINGS TO DO

Take a tour of the Court
We offer a range of tours to suit individuals and groups, including in-person and virtual tours.
Exhibitions and events
Find out what's on, including our permanent exhibition about the history and work of the Court.
Our cafe
The UK Supreme Court cafe is open to the public Monday to Friday between 9am and 4pm.
NEWS
Future judgments
•
13 March 2025
Future Judgments
Future judgments
Events
•
10 March 2025
International Women's Day: #Accelerate Action
Chief Executive Vicky Fox and Non-Executive Directors Jane Furniss and Julie Nerney share their thoughts on International Women's Day 2025
Latest judgments
•
6 March 2025
Latest judgments
Latest judgments
SPEECHES
LATEST JUDGMENTS
6 March 2025
The Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia (Cultural Bureau) (Appellant) v Costantine (Respondent)- In the matter of an application for Judicial Review by JR123 (Appellant) (Northern Ireland)
26 February 2025
Brown (Respondent) v Ridley and another (Appellants)- N3 (AP) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)
- ZA (AP) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)