
The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
We are the final court of appeal in the UK for civil cases, and for criminal cases from England, Wales and Northern Ireland. The Supreme Court hears cases of the greatest public or constitutional importance affecting the whole population.
The Court is closed for the remainder of the day
LISTINGS
Upcoming
- Alteo Energy Ltd (Respondent) v Director General, Mauritius Revenue Authority (Appellant) (Mauritius)
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Judgment
30 June 2026
Lord Sales,
Lord Hamblen,
Lord Leggatt,
Lady Simler,
Lord Doherty
Is the First Respondent entitled to a partial tax exemption on interest income received from certain loans?
- Optis Cellular Technology LLC and others (Respondents) v Apple Retail UK Limited and others (Appellants) No 2
UK Supreme Court
Hearing
29 June 2026
Lord Reed,
Lord Briggs,
Lord Leggatt,
Lady Simler,
Lord Kitchin
What is the correct approach that UK courts should adopt when determining fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (“FRAND”) terms for global portfolio licences of standard essential patents? Did the Court of Appeal err in reaching its own determination of the FRAND rate in this case, instead of remitting the matter for re-assessment? Did the Court of Appeal err in its approach to the question of payment of royalties on past sales in FRAND licences? Did the Court of Appeal err in its consideration of the effects of parallel foreign patent infringement proceedings?
Linked cases
- Optis Cellular Technology LLC and others (Respondents) v Apple Retail UK Limited and others (Appellants) No 1
UK Supreme Court
Hearing
29 June 2026
Lord Reed,
Lord Briggs,
Lord Leggatt,
Lady Simler,
Lord Kitchin
What is the correct approach that UK courts should adopt when determining fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (“FRAND”) terms for global portfolio licences of standard essential patents? Did the Court of Appeal err in reaching its own determination of the FRAND rate in this case, instead of remitting the matter for re-assessment? Did the Court of Appeal err in its approach to the question of payment of royalties on past sales in FRAND licences? Did the Court of Appeal err in its consideration of the effects of parallel foreign patent infringement proceedings?
Linked cases
- Skatteforvaltningen (The Danish Customs and Tax Administration) (Appellant) v MCML Ltd (previously known as ED&F Man Capital Markets Ltd) (Respondent)
UK Supreme Court
Judgment
1 July 2026
Lord Sales,
Lord Lloyd-Jones,
Lady Rose,
Lady Simler,
Lord Doherty
Is a claim brought by SKAT against EDFM barred by issue estoppel because of the dismissal of an earlier claim brought by SKAT against EDFM?
- Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Respondent) v BlueCrest Capital Management (UK) LLP (Appellant)
UK Supreme Court
Judgment
1 July 2026
Lord Briggs,
Lord Hamblen,
Lord Burrows,
Lord Richards,
Lady Simler
Are certain members of BlueCrest LLP to be treated as employees for tax purposes?
THINGS TO DO

Take a tour of the Court
We offer a range of tours to suit individuals and groups, including in-person and virtual tours.
Exhibitions and events
Find out what's on, including our permanent exhibition about the history and work of the Court.
Our cafe
The UK Supreme Court cafe is open to the public Monday to Friday between 9am and 4pm.
NEWS

Future judgments
•
24 June 2026
Future Judgments
Future judgments

Permission to Appeal
•
22 June 2026
Permission to Appeal - May 2026
Refusal of permission to appeal, and the reasons given for refusing permission to appeal, have no status as a precedent.

Latest judgments
•
17 June 2026
Latest judgments
Latest judgments
SPEECHES
LATEST JUDGMENTS
17 June 2026
Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Appellant) v HFFX LLP (Respondent)- Atkins and others (Appellants) v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Respondent)
2 June 2026
A Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland of a devolution issue under paragraph 34 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 19987 May 2026
In the matter of an application by Martina Dillon, John McEvoy, Brigid Hughes and Lynda McManus for Judicial Review (Appellants) No 2- In the matter of an application by Martina Dillon, John McEvoy, Brigid Hughes and Lynda McManus for Judicial Review (Respondents)


