5.13,1.02.34,2.02.44,3.04">

UK Supreme Court

Judgment

9 September 2026

In the Petition of DM No 2

Lord Reed,

Lord Stephens,

Lady Simler,

Lord Doherty,

Lord Snowden

Can the views of a child be taken into account when considering whether the defence under Article 13(b) of the Hague Convention 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“the Convention”) is made out? Were the Inner House correct to override the Outer House’s decision as to whether the child concerned should be returned?

Linked cases

Legal Issue


  • UK Supreme Court

    Judgment

    9 September 2026

    In the Petition of DM No 1

    Lord Reed,

    Lord Stephens,

    Lady Simler,

    Lord Doherty,

    Lord Snowden

    Can the views of a child be taken into account when considering whether the defence under Article 13(b) of the Hague Convention 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“the Convention”) is made out? Were the Inner House correct to override the Outer House’s decision as to whether the child concerned should be returned?

    Linked cases


  • The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council

    Hearing

    5 October 2026

    EGALLYS Limited (Appellant) v The Information and Communication Technologies Authority (Respondent) (Mauritius)

    Lord Briggs,

    Lady Simler,

    Lord Doherty

    Did the Court of Appeal err in dismissing the application on the basis that the sole director of the company failed to provide evidence that he was authorised to represent the company in proceedings?


  • UK Supreme Court

    Hearing

    4 November 2026

    R (on the application of Ammori) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)

    Was the decision of the Secretary of State for the Home Department to proscribe Palestine Action under section 3 of the Terrorism Act 2000 lawful?


  • The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council

    Hearing

    11 November 2026

    Gryffyn Benevides (a minor, by Jason Benevides, her father and next friend) (Appellant) v Minister for Education (Respondent) (Bermuda)

    Lord Hamblen,

    Lord Burrows,

    Lady Simler

    Whether the mandatory testing regime 1. breached the Appellant's constitutional right to not be searched without his consent; 2. were not based on lawful authority; 3. breached the principle of legality.


  • View all listings

    THINGS TO DO

    Visit us
    Things to do image

    Take a tour of the Court

    We offer a range of tours to suit individuals and groups, including in-person and virtual tours.

    Exhibitions and events

    Find out what's on, including our permanent exhibition about the history and work of the Court.

    Our cafe

    The UK Supreme Court cafe is open to the public Monday to Friday between 9am and 4pm.