Visit JCPCAll cases
1199 Cases
UKSC/2010/0101
•
Judgment givenCase summary:See judgment
Last updated: 17 January 2025
UKSC/2022/0133
•
EMPLOYMENT
Judgment givenCase summary:Was the CA wrong to find that Tesco was entitled to terminate certain employment contracts which included an entitlement to "Retained Pay", described as "permanent", and offer re-engagement on terms without Retained Pay (the so-called "fire and re-hire" mechanism)?
Last updated: 17 January 2025
UKSC/2023/0047
•
HOUSING, LANDLORD & TENANT
Judgment givenCase summary:Does a failure to serve a claim notice on an intermediate landlord with no management responsibilities invalidate a right to manage claim under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002?
Last updated: 17 January 2025
UKSC/2023/0126
•
CONSTITUTION
Awaiting JudgmentCase summary:1. Was the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 10(1) of the Dartmoor Commons Act 1985 (the "Act") wrong because it did not: (a) correctly look to the issue the Act was intended to address, in the context of reviewing appropriate background materials; or (b) interpret the Act consistently with relevant legal principles (including the principle of legality and the principle against expropriation)? 2. Was the Court of Appeal wrong to hold that Pepper v Hart could not apply or did not assist the Appellants?
Last updated: 17 January 2025
UKSC/2024/0055
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Awaiting JudgmentCase summary:Should the SST’s decision to detain a yacht in London under the UK’s Russian sanctions regime be set aside on (i) human rights, or (ii) public law, grounds?
Last updated: 17 January 2025
UKSC/2025/0009
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 17 January 2025
UKSC/2025/0008
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 17 January 2025
UKSC/2024/0045
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Awaiting JudgmentCase summary:(i) Did the Court of Appeal adopt the wrong approach to determining whether the Appellant’s designation was a proportionate interference with his rights under Article 8 and Article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”)? (ii) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to conclude that maintaining the Appellant’s designation was not a breach of his rights under Article 8 and Article 1, Protocol 1 of the ECHR?
Last updated: 16 January 2025
UKSC/2024/0044
•
BUSINESS, PROPERTY, WILLS, AND TRUSTS
Hearing listedCase summary:What is the period of ten years in which an applicant for registration as the owner of land over on the basis of adverse possession must hold the reasonable belief that they were the owner of that land under paragraph 5(4)(c) of Schedule 6 of the Land Registration Act 2002?
Last updated: 16 January 2025
UKSC/2023/0178
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Hearing listedCase summary:Whether section 2(2)(b) of the Freedom of Information Act permits aggregation.
Last updated: 16 January 2025
UKSC/2023/0131
•
COMMERCIAL
Hearing listedCase summary:(1) On its true construction, does the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims 1976 (‘1976 Convention’) permit a charterer to limit its liability to an owner for a claim concerning loss originally suffered by the owner, itself? (2) On their true construction, what is the scope of Article 2.1(a) and (f), 1976 Convention?
Last updated: 16 January 2025
UKSC/2023/0111
•
TORT
Hearing listedCase summary:Is the Appellant entitled to lost years earnings from the Respondent?
Last updated: 16 January 2025
UKSC/2024/0016
•
TAX
Hearing listedCase summary:Is a tender support vessel a “relevant asset” within the meaning of the s.356LA of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 and therefore subject to certain restrictions on tax deductions?
Last updated: 16 January 2025
UKSC/2024/0047
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Hearing listedCase summary:Is there a statutory limitation period applicable to a claim under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006? If so, what is that period?
Last updated: 16 January 2025
UKSC/2024/0108
•
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING
Hearing listedCase summary:Does Regulation 63 of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 (“the Habitats Regulations”) require an ‘appropriate assessment’ to be undertaken for subsequent approvals after the grant of outline planning permission at a further consent stage (i.e. at the approval of reserved matters and discharge of conditions stages)?
Last updated: 16 January 2025
Sign up for case email alerts
Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.