UKSC/2019/0134

In the matter of XY (AP) (Appellant) (Scotland)

Judgment given

Case summary


Case ID

UKSC/2019/0134

Parties

Appellant(s)

XY

Respondent(s)

Principal Reporter

Lord Advocate

Lord Advocate

Adovcate General

XY's sister

Issue

Do the provisions of the Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011 ("the Act") violate Articles 6 and 8 of the ECHR such that they are not law for the purposes of section 29 of the Scotland Act 1998? Should a declaration of incompatibility be made in respect of these provisions?

Facts

XY is the adult sibling of three younger sisters who are the subject of Compulsory Supervision Orders. XY’s application to be deemed a "relevant person" for the purposes of those proceedings was refused by a pre-hearing panel. He appealed to the Sheriff, arguing that the relevant legislation was incompatible with Articles 6 and 8 of the ECHR. This appeal was dismissed, as was an appeal by way of case stated to the Court of Session, which relied on the reasoning in two earlier cases: ABC v Principal Reporter 2018 SLT 1281 and DM v Locality Reported SLT 1308. The appellant now seeks permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Date of issue

7 June 2019

Judgment appealed

Judgment details


Judgment date

18 June 2020

Neutral citation

[2020] UKSC 26

Judgment summary

18 June 2020

Appeal


Justices

Hearing dates

Full hearing

Start date

13 November 2019

End date

14 November 2019

Change log

Last updated 16 April 2024

Back to top

Sign up for updates about this case

Sign up to receive email alerts when this case is updated.