UKSC/2019/0118

Mastercard Incorporated and others (Appellants) v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE (Respondent)

Judgment given

Case summary


Case ID

UKSC/2019/0118

Parties

Appellant(s)

Mastercard Incorporated and others

Respondent(s)

Walter Hugh Merricks CBE

Issue

(1) What is the legal test for certification of claims as eligible for inclusion in collective proceedings? (2) What is the correct approach to questions regarding the distribution of an aggregate award at the stage at which a party is applying for a Collective Proceedings Order ("CPO")?

Facts

This case concerns an application for a CPO to enable the continuation of proceedings brought by the respondent as a proposed class representative for 46.2 million people who between 22 May 1992 and 21 June 2008 purchased goods and/or services from businesses in the UK that accepted Mastercard cards. The Competition Appeal Tribunal ("CAT") concluded that these claims were not suitable to be brought in collective proceedings and it therefore declined to make a CPO in the case. The Court of Appeal set aside this order and remitted the application for a CPO to the CAT. The appellants now seek permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Date of issue

14 May 2019

Judgment details


Judgment date

11 December 2020

Neutral citation

[2020] UKSC 51

Judgment summary

11 December 2020

Appeal


Justices

Hearing dates

Full hearing

Start date

13 May 2020

End date

14 May 2020

Watch hearings


13 May 2020 - Morning session

13 May 2020 - Afternoon session

14 May 2020 - Morning session

Change log

Last updated 16 April 2024

Back to top

Sign up for updates about this case

Sign up to receive email alerts when this case is updated.