UKSC/2018/0178
•
PROCEDURE
Sevilleja (Respondent) v Marex Financial Ltd (Appellant)
Case summary
Case ID
UKSC/2018/0178
Parties
Appellant(s)
Marex Financial Ltd
Respondent(s)
Carlos Sevilleja Garcia (‘Mr Sevilleja’)
Intervener(s)
All Party Parliamentary Group on Fair Business Banking
Issue
Whether the rule against reflective loss bars creditors of a company from claiming directly against a third party for asset-stripping the company.
Facts
Marex accuses Mr Sevilleja of asset-stripping two companies so that they were unable to pay their judgment debt to Marex, by transferring money from their bank accounts in this jurisdiction into his personal control. Marex says that in doing so, Mr Sevilleja, who is not resident in this jurisdiction, committed a tort. On this basis, it obtained permission to serve proceedings on him out of the jurisdiction. Mr Sevilleja challenged the validity of service, and the court’s jurisdiction. He says that the rule against reflective loss bars Marex from showing a completed cause of action in tort. The rule bars a party who has suffered loss through a reduction in value of their interest in a company from claiming directly against the person who caused the loss to the company, rather than letting the company make the claim. This appeal raises the question of how far the rule applies to creditors.
Date of issue
24 August 2018
Judgment appealed
Judgment details
Judgment date
15 July 2020
Neutral citation
[2020] UKSC 31
Judgment links
Judgment summary
15 July 2020
All videos on this page are recorded and transmitted in line with the Court's terms of use. These can be found here.. Please Note: Every effort is being made to provide a satisfactory streaming service of the Supreme Court judgments and hearings. However, these services may be subject to technical issues or delay, in which case we will attempt to resolve them as soon as possible.
Appeal
Justices
Hearing dates
Start date
8 May 2019
End date
8 May 2019
Change log
Last updated 16 April 2024