Visit JCPCUKSC/2017/0126
•
EU LAW
R (on the application of Association of Independent Meat Suppliers and another) (Appellants) v Food Standards Agency (Respondent)
Case summary
Case ID
UKSC/2017/0126
Parties
Appellant(s)
See judgment
Respondent(s)
See judgment
Issue
The issue is whether there is a right of appeal against an Official Veterinarian’s assessment of the fitness of meat for human consumption where there is a dispute as to the fitness of the meat for human consumption.
Facts
In 2014, Cleveland Meat Company Limited ("Cleveland") purchased a bull at Darlington Farmers Mart for about £1400. After the animal was slaughtered, the Official Veterinarian ("OV") found that the animal was diseased and so declared it unfit for human consumption, and refused to award it a health mark. Cleveland did not agree with the OV’s decision. Cleveland considered the bull was healthy and sought to challenge the OV’s decision. The Food Standards Agency, however, took the view that there was no right to appeal against or challenge a decision of an OV as to the fitness of meat for human consumption. Cleveland brought a claim for judicial review of the decision that it had no right of appeal against the OV’s decision.
Date of issue
17 July 2017
Interim Judgment details
Judgment date
24 July 2019
Neutral citation
[2019] UKSC 36
Judgment links
Full Judgment details
Judgment date
8 December 2021
Neutral citation
[2021] UKSC 54
Judgment links
Judgment summary
24 December 2021
All videos on this page are recorded and transmitted in line with the Court's terms of use. These can be found here.. Please Note: Every effort is being made to provide a satisfactory streaming service of the Supreme Court judgments and hearings. However, these services may be subject to technical issues or delay, in which case we will attempt to resolve them as soon as possible.
Appeal
Justices
Hearing dates
Start date
5 March 2019
End date
5 March 2019
Change log
Last updated 16 April 2024