Permission to Appeal - July 2024
| Case Name | Justices | PTA | Reasons given |
|---|---|---|---|
|
UKSC 2024/0071 R (on the application of the Fire Brigades Union and others) (Appellants) v His Majesty's Treasury and another (Respondents) Neutral Citation: [2024] EWCA Civ 355 |
Lord Reed Lord Stephens Lady Simler |
Refused 22 July 2024 |
Permission to appeal is refused on the ground that the appeal does not raise an arguable point of law. |
|
UKSC 2024/0067 Okotete (Appellant) v Public Prosecution Service for Northern Ireland (Respondent) Neutral Citation: [2023] NICA 46 |
Lord Reed Lord Stephens Lady Simler |
Refused 22 July 2024 |
Permission to appeal is refused on the ground that the appeal does not raise an arguable point of law or a point of law of general public importance. |
|
UKSC 2024/0087 R v Hayes (Appellant) Neutral Citation: [2024] EWCA Crim 304 |
Lord Reed Lord Stephens Lady Simler |
Granted 22 July 2024 |
|
|
UKSC 2024/0088 R v Palombo (Appellant) Neutral Citation: [2024] EWCA Crim 304 |
Lord Reed Lord Stephens Lady Simler |
Granted 22 July 2024 |
|
|
UKSC 2024/0065 The Prudential Assurance Company Ltd (Appellant) v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Respondent) Neutral Citation: [2024] EWCA Civ 300 |
Lord Hodge Lady Rose Lord Richards |
Granted 30 July 2024 |
|
|
UKSC 2024/0073 R (on the application of Roehrig) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) Neutral Citation: [2024] EWCA Civ 240 |
Lord Hodge Lady Rose Lord Richards |
Refused 22 July 2024 |
Permission to appeal is refused on the ground that the appeal does not raise an arguable point of law. |
|
UKSC 2024/0029 Moss (Appellant) v Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames and another (Respondents) Neutral Citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 1438 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Hamblen Lord Leggatt |
Refused 30 July 2024 |
Permission to appeal is refused on the ground that the appeal does not raise an arguable point of law. |
|
UKSC 2024/0064 Deutsche Bank AG and another (Respondents) v Vik (Appellant) Neutral Citation: [2024] EWCA Civ 245 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Hamblen Lord Leggatt |
Refused 30 July 2024 |
Permission to appeal is refused on the ground that the appeal does not raise an arguable point of law. |
|
UKSC 2024/0066 Waller-Edwards (Appellant) v One Savings Bank Plc (Respondent) Neutral Citation: [2024] EWCA Civ 302 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Hamblen Lord Leggatt |
Granted 30 July 2024 |
|
|
UKSC 2024/0068 Procter and another (Appellants) v Procter (Respondent) Neutral Citation: [2024] EWCA Civ 324 |
Lord Briggs Lord Sales Lord Burrows |
Refused 22 July 2024 |
Permission to appeal is refused on the ground that the appeal does not raise an arguable point of law. |
|
UKSC 2024/0072 Donovan (Respondent) v Prescott Place Freeholder Limited and others (Appellants) Neutral Citation: [2024] EWCA Civ 298 |
Lord Briggs Lord Sales Lord Burrows |
Granted 22 July 2024 |
|
|
UKSC 2024/0053 R (on the application of LA (Albania)) (Appellant) v Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber and another (Respondents) Neutral Citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 1337 |
Lord Reed Lord Sales Lady Rose |
Refused 1 July 2024 |
Permission to appeal be REFUSED because the Court does not have jurisdiction for the reasons attached. |
|
UKSC 2024/0049 R (on the application of Coal Action Network) (Appellant) v Welsh Ministers and others (Respondent) Neutral Citation: [2024] EWCA Civ 168 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Leggatt Lord Richards |
Refused 1 July 2024 |
PTA is refused because there is no arguable point of law which could result in the appeal succeeding. In any event, there is no point of law of general public importance. |
|
UKSC 2024/0061 The Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia (Cultural Bureau) (Appellant) v Costantine (Respondent) Neutral Citation: [2024] EWCA Civ 332 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Leggatt Lord Richards |
Granted 1 July 2024 |
|
|
UKSC 2024/0062 Rea (Respondent) v Rea and others (Appellants) Neutral Citation: [2024] EWCA Civ 169 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Leggatt Lord Richards |
Refused 1 July 2024 |
Permission is refused on the ground that the appeal does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance. |