Permission to Appeal - January 2024
Case Name | Justices | PTA | Reasons given |
---|---|---|---|
UKSC 2023/0142
Stevens (Respondent) v Hotel Portfolio II UK Ltd (In Liquidation) and another (Appellants) Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 1120 |
Lord Reed Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Granted 31 January 2024 |
|
UKSC 2023/0062
Rukhadze and others (Appellants) v Recovery Partners GP Ltd and another (Respondents) Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 305 |
Lord Reed Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Permission for this cross appeal is refused. 31 January 2024 |
This cross-appeal does not raise an arguable question of law. |
UKSC 2023/0068
Glasgow City Council (Respondent) v X (Appellant) (AP) (Scotland) Neutral citation: [2023] CSIH 7 |
Lord Hodge Lord Sales Lady Simler |
PTA Granted 31 January 2024 |
|
UKSC 2023/0143
R (on the application of The National Council for Civil Liberties ('Liberty')) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another (Respondents) Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 926 |
Lord Hodge Lord Sales Lady Simler |
PTA Refused 31 January 2024 |
PTA Refused because there is no arguable point of law. |
UKSC 2023/0147
Darty Holdings SAS (Respondent) v Carton-Kelly (as additional liquidator of CGL Realisations Ltd) (Appellant) [2023] EWCA Civ 1135 |
Lord Hodge Lord Sales Lady Simler |
PTA Refused 31 January 2024 |
Permission to appeal is refused because the appeal does not raise a point of law which is arguable or of general public importance. |
UKSC 2023/0140
Celik (AP) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 921 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Leggatt Lady Rose |
PTA Refused 24 January 2024 |
Permission to appeal is refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
UKSC 2023/0141
Volterra Fietta (Appellant) v Diag Human SE and another (Respondents) Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 1107 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Leggatt Lady Rose |
PTA Refused 24 January 2024 |
Permission to appeal is refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
UKSC 2023/0144
Olsten (UK) Holdings Ltd (Respondent) v Adecco Group European Works Council (Appellant) Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 883 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Leggatt Lady Rose |
PTA Refused 24 January 2024 |
PTA Refused because there is no arguable point of law. |
UKSC 2023/0146
Mints and others (Appellants) v PJSC National Bank Trust and another (Respondents) Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 1132 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Leggatt Lady Rose |
PTA Granted 24 January 2024 |
|
UKSC 2023/0148
Khan (Appellant) v Singh (as trustee in bankruptcy of Mohammed Razi Khan) and another (Respondents) Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 1119 |
Lord Briggs Lord Stephens Lord Richards |
PTA Refused 1 February 2024 |
PTA is refused because there is no arguable point of law on Ground 2 which if corrected could have led to a different outcome, otherwise no arguable point of law. |
UKSC 2023/0149
In the matter of SA (by her Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor) (Declaration of Non-Recognition of Marriage) (AP) Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 1003 |
Lord Briggs Lord Stephens Lord Richards |
PTA Refused 1 February 2024 |
PTA is Refused because there is no arguable point of law. |