Visit JCPCPermission to Appeal - March 2025
You may need to turn your phone when viewing table on mobile phone
| Case Name | Justices | PTA | Reasons given |
|---|---|---|---|
| UKSC 2025/0005 - AXA Insurance UK PLC and another (Appellants) v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and another (Respondents) | Lord Reed Lord Hamblen Lady Rose | Granted 4 April 2025 | |
| UKSC 2025/0006 - McCluskey (Appellant) v Scott Wilson Scotland Limited (Respondent) | Lord Reed Lord Hamblen Lady Rose | Refused 4 April 2025 | Permission to appeal refused on the ground that the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| UKSC 2025/0011 - Iqbal (Appellant) v Geo TV Limited (Respondent) | Lord Hodge Lord Leggatt Lord Stephens | Refused 4 April 2025 | Permission to appeal refused on the ground that the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| UKSC 2025/0013 - In the matter of an application by Martina Dillon, John McEvoy, Brigid Hughes and Lynda McManus for Judicial Review (Respondents) | Lord Hodge Lord Leggatt Lord Stephens | Granted 7 April 2025 | |
| UKSC 2025/0001 - In the matter of an application by Eileen Wilson for Judicial Review (Appellant) | Lord Hodge Lord Leggatt Lord Stephens | Refused 7 April 2025 | Permission to appeal refused on the ground that the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| UKSC 2024/1009 - CRF 1 Limited (Respondent) v Banco Nacional De Cuba (Appellant) | Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Sales Lord Richards | Refused 31 March 2025 | Permission to appeal refused on the ground that the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| UKSC 2025/0015 - Jones (Respondent) v The Welsh Ministers (Appellant) | Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Sales Lord Richards | Refused 31 March 2025 | Permission to appeal refused on the ground that the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| UKSC 2025/0008 - McCalla (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Defence (Respondent) | Lord Briggs Lord Burrows Lady Simler | Refused 7 April 2025 | Permission to appeal refused on the ground that the application does not raise an arguable point of law, and the application does not raise a point of law of general public importance. |