Permission to Appeal - January 2024
You may need to turn your phone when viewing table on mobile phone
Case Name | Justices | PTA | Reasons given |
---|---|---|---|
UKSC 2023/0142 Stevens (Respondent) v Hotel Portfolio II UK Ltd (In Liquidation) and another (Appellants) Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 1120 | Lord Reed Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows | Granted 31 January 2024 | |
UKSC 2023/0062 Rukhadze and others (Appellants) v Recovery Partners GP Ltd and another (Respondents)Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 305 | Lord Reed Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows | Permission for this cross appeal is refused. 31 January 2024 | This cross-appeal does not raise an arguable question of law. |
UKSC 2023/0068 Glasgow City Council (Respondent) v X (Appellant) (AP) (Scotland)Neutral citation: [2023] CSIH 7 | Lord Hodge Lord Sales Lady Simler | PTA Granted 31 January 2024 | |
UKSC 2023/0143 R (on the application of The National Council for Civil Liberties ('Liberty')) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another (Respondents)Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 926 | Lord Hodge Lord Sales Lady Simler | PTA Refused 31 January 2024 | PTA Refused because there is no arguable point of law. |
UKSC 2023/0147 Darty Holdings SAS (Respondent) v Carton-Kelly (as additional liquidator of CGL Realisations Ltd) (Appellant)[2023] EWCA Civ 1135 | Lord Hodge Lord Sales Lady Simler | PTA Refused 31 January 2024 | Permission to appeal is refused because the appeal does not raise a point of law which is arguable or of general public importance. |
UKSC 2023/0140 Celik (AP) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 921 | Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Leggatt Lady Rose | PTA Refused 24 January 2024 | Permission to appeal is refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
UKSC 2023/0141 Volterra Fietta (Appellant) v Diag Human SE and another (Respondents)Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 1107 | Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Leggatt Lady Rose | PTA Refused 24 January 2024 | Permission to appeal is refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
UKSC 2023/0144 Olsten (UK) Holdings Ltd (Respondent) v Adecco Group European Works Council (Appellant)Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 883 | Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Leggatt Lady Rose | PTA Refused 24 January 2024 | PTA Refused because there is no arguable point of law. |
UKSC 2023/0146 Mints and others (Appellants) v PJSC National Bank Trust and another (Respondents)Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 1132 | Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Leggatt Lady Rose | PTA Granted 24 January 2024 | |
UKSC 2023/0148 Khan (Appellant) v Singh (as trustee in bankruptcy of Mohammed Razi Khan) and another (Respondents)Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 1119 | Lord Briggs Lord Stephens Lord Richards | PTA Refused 1 February 2024 | PTA is refused because there is no arguable point of law on Ground 2 which if corrected could have led to a different outcome, otherwise no arguable point of law. |
UKSC 2023/0149 In the matter of SA (by her Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor) (Declaration of Non-Recognition of Marriage) (AP)Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 1003 | Lord Briggs Lord Stephens Lord Richards | PTA Refused 1 February 2024 | PTA is Refused because there is no arguable point of law. |