UKSC/2025/0055/A

Expert Tooling and Automation Limited (Respondent) v Engie Power Limited (Appellant) No 2

Case summary


Case ID

UKSC/2025/0055/A

Parties

Appellant(s)

ENGIE POWER LIMITED

Respondent(s)

Expert Tooling and Automation Limited

Issue

Was the Court of Appeal wrong to conclude that (i) informed consent to the payment of the commission had not been obtained, and (ii) that the limitation period only started to run from the date of payment of the commission rather than the date of entry into the contract?

Facts

This case concerns the liability of someone who pays commission to the agent of a third party principal, where the circumstances of the commission are only partially disclosed to the principal (sometimes referred to as a “half-secret” commission case). The claimant, Expert Tooling and Automation Limited (“Tooling”), is a company carrying on business as a manufacturer of tools and related equipment and machinery. It consumes significant amounts of energy. The defendant, Engie Power Limited (“Engie”), supplies electricity. Tooling used the services of a third party broker, Utilitywise Plc (“UW”), to negotiate and, in some cases, execute on its behalf electricity supply contracts with Engie. UW was paid nothing by Tooling, but received a commission from Engie, the amount of which was added to the unit price Tooling paid for electricity under its contracts with Engie. Tooling was aware that UW Would be paid commission by Engie, but did not know other material matters, including how much. UW was dissolved on 19 May 2022, having gone into administration on 13 February 2019. Tooling claimed that it was entitled to recover from Engie the amount of the commissions it had paid to UW. An important recent decision concerning secret commissions (or bribes) was delivered by the Court of Appeal in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Limited [2024] EWCA Civ 1282. That decision is currently under appeal to the Supreme Court. The oral hearing took place in April. The High Court dismissed Tooling’s claim. The Court of Appeal allowed Tooling’s appeal in part but left undisturbed the order of the High Court dismissing the claim. The Court of Appeal granted Tooling permission to appeal to the Supreme Court in respect of two issues. The Court of Appeal refused Engie permission to cross-appeal in relation to the issues of informed consent and limitation. Engie now applies directly to the Supreme Court to cross-appeal in relation to those issues.

Date of issue

14 May 2025

Case origin

PTA

Linked cases


Previous proceedings

Back to top

Sign up for updates about this case

Sign up to receive email alerts when this case is updated.