UKSC/2024/0095

In the matter of an application by JR87 and another for Judicial Review (Appellant)

Judgment given

Case summary


Case ID

UKSC/2024/0095

Parties

Appellant(s)

JR87

G

Respondent(s)

The Department of Education for Northern Ireland

Issue

Do religious education and collective worship provided in a school in Northern Ireland breach the rights of a child, and the child’s parents, under Article 2 of the First Protocol (“A2P1”) to the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”) read with Article 9 ECHR?

Facts

JR87, the first appellant, attended a controlled primary school in Belfast. As part of the curriculum she took part in non-denominational Christian religious education and collective worship. JR87’s parents did not wish her to be taught that Christianity was an absolute truth. In May 2019, the parents wrote a letter to the school voicing concerns that their daughter’s education did not appear to conform with their own religious and philosophical convictions. They enquired as to what inspection mechanisms were in place to ensure that children were receiving a balanced religious education. In a reply dated 21 June 2019, the school confirmed that its provision of religious education and collective worship was “Bible-based”, that it followed the core syllabus for education, and that it complied with the requirements of the legislation and the core syllabus at an age-appropriate level. JR87’s father “G”, the second appellant, challenged the legality of the religious education and collective worship and sought judicial review against the respondent, the Department of Education. The appellants argued that the religious education and collective worship in the school contravened their rights under A2P1, which requires the State providing education to “respect the right of parents to ensure such education is in conformity with their own religious and philosophical convictions”, read with Article 9 ECHR, which guarantees everyone the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. The High Court found that the religious education and collective worship was in breach of both appellants’ rights under A2P1 read with Article 9 ECHR. The Court of Appeal allowed the respondent’s appeal. The appellants now appeal to the Supreme Court.

Date of issue

3 July 2024

Judgment appealed

Judgment details


Judgment date

19 November 2025

Neutral citation

[2025] UKSC 40

Judgment summary

19 November 2025

Appeal


Justices

Hearing dates

Full hearing

Start date

21 May 2025

End date

21 May 2025

Half hearing

Start date

22 May 2025

End date

22 May 2025

Watch hearings


21 May 2025 - Morning session

21 May 2025 - Afternoon session

22 May 2025 - Morning session

Change log

Last updated 7 April 2025

Back to top

Sign up for updates about this case

Sign up to receive email alerts when this case is updated.