Visit JCPCUKSC/2023/0154
•
COURT PROCEDURE
R (Appellant) v Layden (Respondent)
Case summary
Case ID
UKSC/2023/0154
Parties
Appellant(s)
The King
Respondent(s)
Stuart James Layden
Issue
Is the jurisdiction of the Crown Court to retry a defendant under sections 7 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1988 contingent upon the fulfilment of the procedural requirements contained in section 8 of the same act, such that a defendant who has not been arraigned within two months of the date of the order committing him for retrial cannot be lawfully retrial (save with leave of the Court of Appeal)?
Facts
On 11 April 2013, the respondent and four other defendants were convicted of the murder of Ian Church on 4 May 2012. On 19 March 2015, the Court of Appeal of England and Wales granted the respondent’s appeal against this conviction on the basis that the trial judge’s directions in relation to the identification evidence in his case had been inadequate. It directed that he be arraigned on a fresh indictment within two months, ie by 19 May 2015. The appellant was granted bail on 2 April 2015. On 14 April 2015, the appellant served the respondent with a fresh indictment. A Plea and Case Management Hearing took place on 7 May 2015, at which the respondent was present and represented by counsel. No arraignment took place at that hearing, but counsel for the respondent informed the court that the case would be contested. The court directed that the trial was to take place on 28 September 2015. On the morning of the trial, the appellant submitted that it was not necessary to arraign the respondent. The respondent did not raise an issue with this. The court log erroneously indicates that the respondent was arraigned a few minutes after this discussion. At the beginning of the trial, the court clerk informed the jury in the normal way that the respondent had pleaded not guilty to the charge of murder. The first trial was discharged, owing to issues surrounding the disclosure of unused material. The second trial concluded on 17 May 2016, with the appellant being convicted. The Court of Appeal refused permission to appeal against his conviction. In 2018, the respondent applied to the Criminal Cases Review Commission for a review of his conviction. Following the Court of Appeal’s decision in R v Llewellyn in February 2022, the Commission considered that there was a real possibility that the Court of Appeal would quash his conviction and so referred the case to the Court of Appeal. On 25 October 2023, the Court of Appeal, concluding that it was bound by its previous decision in R v Llewellyn, quashed the respondent’s conviction on the basis that it was unsafe. The appellant now appeals to the Supreme Court.
Date of issue
28 November 2023
Judgment appealed
Judgment details
Judgment date
2 April 2025
Neutral citation
[2024] UKSC 12
Appeal
Justices
Hearing dates
Full hearing
Start date
3 March 2025
End date
3 March 2025
Half hearing
Start date
4 March 2025
End date
4 March 2025
Watch hearings
3 March 2025 - Morning session
3 March 2025 - Afternoon session
4 March 2025 - Morning session
All videos on this page are recorded and transmitted in line with the Court's terms of use. These can be found here. Please Note: Every effort is being made to provide a satisfactory streaming service of the Supreme Court judgments and hearings. However, these services may be subject to technical issues or delay, in which case we will attempt to resolve them as soon as possible.
Change log
Last updated 20 December 2024