R (on the application of Finch on behalf of the Weald Action Group) (Appellant) v Surrey County Council and others (Respondents)
Case ID: 2022/0064
Case summary
Issue
Under Directive 2011/92 EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, was it unlawful for the Council not to require the environmental impact assessment for a project of crude oil extraction for commercial purposes to include an assessment of the impacts of downstream greenhouse gas emissions resulting from the eventual use of the refined products of the extracted oil?
Facts
In December 2018, the second respondent, Horse Hill Developments Ltd, sought planning permission from the first respondent, Surrey County Council ("the Council"), to retain and expand an existing onshore oil well site (comprising two wells) and to drill for four new wells, enabling the production of hydrocarbons from six wells over a period of 25 years. The environmental impact assessment for the project considered the environmental impacts of "the direct releases of greenhouse gases from with the well site boundary resulting from the site's construction, production, decommissioning and subsequent restoration over the lifetime of the proposed development." However, it did not assess the environmental impacts of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions that would inevitably result when the oil extracted from the development site was later refined and then used, for example, as fuel. The Council granted planning permission for the development on 27 September 2019. The appellant applied for judicial review of the Council's decision, acting on behalf of the Weald Action Group. Her claim was unsuccessful before the High Court and the Court of Appeal. The appellant now appeals to the Supreme Court.
Judgment appealed
Parties
Appellant(s)
Sarah Finch
Respondent(s)
(1) Surrey County Council
(2) Horse Hill Developments
(3) Secretary of State for Housing
(4) Communities and Local Government
Intervener(s)
(1) Friends of the Earth
(2) Greenpeace Ltd
(3) The Office for Environmental Protection
(4) West Cumbria Mining Ltd
Appeal
Justices
Lord Kitchin, Lord Sales, Lord Leggatt, Lady Rose, Lord Richards
Hearing start date
21 June 2023
Hearing finish date
22 June 2023
| Watch hearing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 June 2023 | Morning session | Afternoon session |
| 22 June 2023 | Morning session | |
Judgment details
Judgment date
20 June 2024
Neutral citation
[2024] UKSC 20
- Judgment (PDF)
- Press summary (PDF)
- Judgment on The National Archives (HTML version)
- Press Summary on The National Archives (HTML version)
- Judgment on BAILII (HTML version)
| Watch Judgment summary | |
|---|---|
| 20 June 2024 | Judgment summary |