UKSC/2021/0196

In the matter H-W (Children)

Judgment given

Case summary


Case ID

UKSC/2021/0196

Parties

Appellant(s)

HW

Respondent(s)

A Local Authority

Issue

When an appellate court reviews a first instance decision concerning the proportionality of orders made under the courts’ obligations under the Human Rights Act 1998, is it necessary for the appellate court to undertake its own proportionality assessment of that decision?

Facts

The First Appellant, M, is the mother of six children including C, D, E, and F. Following longstanding concerns related to both sexual abuse by their elder brother A and neglect, in March 2020 the local authority issued proceedings seeking to take C, D, and E into its care and place them in three separate foster homes. It also sought that M’s newly born child F (daughter of the Second Appellant F3) be removed for adoption.Following two hearings, Judge McPhee found that E had been sexually assaulted by her brother, A, and that M and F3 had both failed to protect the children from sexual abuse and delayed reporting the assault. Judge McPhee ultimately concluded that it would not be safe for C, D, and E to remain in the care of M and F3 and therefore made the care orders sought. A final decision in respect of F was postponed.The First Appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal, which by a two to one majority decision dismissed the appeal.

Date of issue

11 October 2021

Judgment appealed

Judgment details


Judgment date

15 June 2022

Neutral citation

[2022] UKSC 17

Judgment summary

15 June 2022

Appeal


Justices

Hearing dates

Start date

22 March 2022

End date

22 March 2022

Watch hearings


22 March 2022 - Morning session

22 March 2022 - Afternoon session

Change log

Last updated 16 April 2024

Back to top

Sign up for updates about this case

Sign up to receive email alerts when this case is updated.