Visit JCPCUKSC/2021/0152
•
CRIME
Popoviciu (Respondent) v Curtea De Apel Bucharest (Romania) (Appellant)
Case summary
Case ID
UKSC/2021/0152
Parties
Appellant(s)
Curtea De Apel Bucharest (Romania)
Respondent(s)
Gabriel Aurel Popoviciu
Issue
In a conviction extradition case, is it sufficient for the requested person to show substantial grounds for believing that there is a real risk that his trial was so flagrantly unfair as to deprive him of the essence of his Article 6 rights, and therefore a real risk that his imprisonment in the requesting state will violate his Article 5 rights?
Facts
Gabriel Popoviciu ("Popoviciu") was convicted in Romania of two offences - accessory to aggravated abuse of power, and bribery – and was sentenced to 7 years' imprisonment.On 3 August 2017, a European Arrest Warrant ("EAW") was issued by the Bucharest Court of Appeal (the "Bucharest Court") seeking the return of Popoviciu. He was arrested on 14 August 2017 and on 12 July 2019 the Westminster Magistrates' Court ordered his extradition.Popoviciu appealed to the Administrative Court on the basis that the judge that convicted him in Romania, Judge Tudoran, had an undisclosed and inappropriate long-standing relationship with the prosecution's primary witness. Popoviciu provided new evidence from a Romanian lawyer who is investigating Judge Tudoran for various corruption-related offences which shed light on his relationship with the prosecution's primary witness. The Administrative Court admitted this new evidence and, having taken it into account, overturned the Westminster Magistrates' Court's order. It held that there was a real risk that Popoviciu’s trial in Romania had been flagrantly unfair, and therefore returning Popoviciu to Romania would breach his Article 5 rights as he faced being imprisoned for a substantial period there because of his conviction. The judge's undisclosed relationship with the primary witness meant that Popoviciu suffered a complete denial of his Article 6 rights. The Bucharest Court now appeals to the Supreme Court.
Date of issue
13 July 2021
Judgment appealed
Judgment details
Judgment date
8 November 2023
Neutral citation
[2023] UKSC 39
Judgment links
Judgment summary
8 November 2023
Appeal
Justices
Hearing dates
Full hearing
Start date
16 May 2023
End date
17 May 2023
Watch hearings
16 May 2023 - Morning session
16 May 2023 - Afternoon session
17 May 2023 - Morning session
All videos on this page are recorded and transmitted in line with the Court's terms of use. These can be found here.. Please Note: Every effort is being made to provide a satisfactory streaming service of the Supreme Court judgments and hearings. However, these services may be subject to technical issues or delay, in which case we will attempt to resolve them as soon as possible.
Change log
Last updated 16 April 2024