UKSC/2021/0130

Potanina (Respondent) v Potanin (Appellant)

Judgment given

Case summary


Case ID

UKSC/2021/0130

Parties

Appellant(s)

Vladimir Olegovich Potanin

Respondent(s)

Natalia Nikolaevna Potanina

Issue

Should the court have granted the wife permission to apply for financial relief pursuant to Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984?

Facts

The parties married in Russia in 1983 and lived there throughout their marriage. They have three adult children. In the 1990s, the husband amassed a large fortune, estimated to amount to $20 billion. The majority of his assets comprised shares in companies or other business entities. These were not registered in the husband's name, though the husband was their beneficial owner. The parties divorced in 2014, which prompted extensive litigation in Russia, as well as claims in the USA and Cyprus. The wife sought to obtain half of the assets beneficially owned by the husband, but her attempts were unsuccessful.In 2019, the wife sought permission to apply for financial relief pursuant to Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984. The High Court Judge initially granted the permission at a "without notice" hearing, where the husband was not represented. However, the Judge subsequently allowed the husband's application to set the permission aside on the basis that the Judge had been misled. The Court of Appeal allowed the wife's appeal. The husband now appeals to the Supreme Court.

Date of issue

10 June 2021

Judgment appealed

Judgment details


Judgment date

31 January 2024

Neutral citation

[2024] UKSC 3

Judgment summary

31 January 2024

Appeal


Justices

Hearing dates

Full hearing

Start date

31 October 2023

End date

1 November 2023

Watch hearings


31 October 2023 - Morning session

31 October 2023 - Afternoon session

1 November 2023 - Morning session

Change log

Last updated 16 April 2024

Back to top

Sign up for updates about this case

Sign up to receive email alerts when this case is updated.