UKSC/2021/0010

Brake and another (Respondents) v Chedington Court Estate Ltd (Appellant)

Judgment given

Case summary


Case ID

UKSC/2021/0010

Parties

Appellant(s)

Chedington Court Estate Ltd

Respondent(s)

Nihal Mohammed Kamal Brake

Andrew Young Brake

Issue

Does a bankrupt have standing under section 303(1) of the Insolvency Act 1986 to challenge transactions entered by their trustee in bankruptcy in situations where the relief sought would have no impact on their position within the bankruptcy?

Facts

The Brakes were made bankrupt in 2015. Their trustee in bankruptcy entered into a number of transactions to dispose of the bankrupt estate. The Brakes sought to challenge the propriety of these transactions under section 303(1) Insolvency Act 1986, which provides for the trustee’s exercise of discretion to be challenged on the application of “dissatisfied” persons. At the Court of Appeal, it was found that the Brakes had sufficient standing to make an application under section 303(1) as bankrupts in their own capacity on the basis that they had a direct interest in the relief sought. The Chedington Court Estate Ltd now appeals to the Supreme Court on the ground that bankrupts cannot have standing to interfere in the conduct of their bankruptcies where the relief sought would have no impact on their position within the bankruptcy and/or where other relief is available to them in the general law.

Date of issue

22 December 2020

Judgment appealed

Judgment details


Judgment date

10 August 2023

Neutral citation

[2023] UKSC 29

Judgment summary

1 November 2023

Appeal


Justices

Hearing dates

Start date

1 November 2022

End date

1 November 2022

Watch hearings


1 November 2022 - Morning session

1 November 2022 - Afternoon session

Change log

Last updated 16 April 2024

Back to top

Sign up for updates about this case

Sign up to receive email alerts when this case is updated.