Visit JCPCUKSC/2020/0155
•
EMPLOYMENT
Basfar (Respondent) v Wong (Appellant)
Case summary
Case ID
UKSC/2020/0155
Parties
Appellant(s)
Josephine Wong
Respondent(s)
Khalid Basfar
Issue
The scope of diplomatic immunity is governed by the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (the "1961 Convention"). The Supreme Court is asked to determine whether:a serving diplomat’s employment of a "trafficked" domestic servant at his UK diplomatic residence constitutes the exercise of a "commercial activity", an exception to the 1961 Convention which would prevent him from asserting immunity from civil suit pursuant to the 1961 Convention; and in arriving at a determination as to the first issue, the Employment Appeals Tribunal ("EAT") was correct that the judgment of the Court of Appeal and the views of Lords Sumption and Neuberger JSC (the "Sumption Judgment") in the case of Reyes v Al-Malki [2019] AC 735 ("Reyes") represent the "current state of the law" given that, in that case, such comments were not central to the issue decided.
Facts
Ms Wong was previously employed in Mr Basfar’s diplomatic household in Saudi Arabia. In August 2016, she was brought to the UK to work in a similar capacity and was provided with a contract stipulating the main terms and conditions of her service. Ms Wong alleges that her conditions of employment amounted to modern slavery. Such allegations have not been proven in these proceedings.In October 2018, Ms Wong brought certain complaints against Mr Basfar in the Employment Tribunal (the "Tribunal"). Mr Basfar sought to defend those claims on the basis of diplomatic immunity conferred by the 1961 Convention. At first instance, the Tribunal held that Ms Wong’s employment and her alleged trafficking by Mr Basfar came within the "commercial activity" exception to diplomatic immunity and held that, had the Supreme Court in Reyes been required to make a determination on this issue, it would not have adopted the Sumption Judgment. On appeal, the EAT held that the judgment of the Court of Appeal and the Sumption Judgment represented the "current state of the law" and, accordingly, allowed Mr Basfar’s appeal. The EAT also granted a "leapfrog" certificate to provide leave to appeal directly to the Supreme Court.
Date of issue
17 August 2020
Judgment appealed
Judgment details
Judgment date
6 July 2022
Neutral citation
[2022] UKSC 20
Judgment links
Judgment summary
6 July 2022
Appeal
Justices
Hearing dates
Full hearing
Start date
13 October 2021
End date
14 October 2021
Watch hearings
13 October 2021 - Morning session
13 October 2021 - Afternoon session
14 October 2021 - Morning session
14 October 2021 - Afternoon session
All videos on this page are recorded and transmitted in line with the Court's terms of use. These can be found here.. Please Note: Every effort is being made to provide a satisfactory streaming service of the Supreme Court judgments and hearings. However, these services may be subject to technical issues or delay, in which case we will attempt to resolve them as soon as possible.
Change log
Last updated 16 April 2024