UKSC/2020/0129

R (on the application of Coughlan) (Appellant) v Minister for the Cabinet Office (Respondent)

Judgment given

Case summary


Case ID

UKSC/2020/0129

Parties

Appellant(s)

Neil Coughlan

Respondent(s)

Minister for the Cabinet Office

Intervener(s)

LGBT Foundation and StonewallOperation Black Vote

the Runnymede Trust

and Voice4Change England

Issue

Are the voter identification ("ID") pilot schemes that were implemented in the May 2019 local government elections unlawful?

Facts

In August 2018 the Cabinet Office invited local authorities to take part in voter ID pilot schemes. Under these schemes, voters would not be allowed to vote in polling booths unless they had a form of ID on them, such as a driver’s licence. On 3 November 2018 the Cabinet Office announced that a number of local authorities had chosen to take part. The Minister for the Cabinet Office then made orders under section 10 of the Representation of the People Act 2000 (the "2000 Act") to allow for voter ID pilot schemes in these areas.Mr Neil Coughlan challenges these orders by way of judicial review. His claim was dismissed by the High Court and the Court of Appeal. He now appeals to the Supreme court, seeking a declaration that these orders are unlawful for being ultra vires section 10 of the 2000 Act.

Date of issue

6 July 2020

Judgment appealed

Judgment details


Judgment date

27 April 2022

Neutral citation

[2022] UKSC 11

Judgment summary

27 April 2022

Appeal


Justices

Hearing dates

Start date

15 February 2022

End date

15 February 2022

Watch hearings


15 February 2022 - Morning session

15 February 2022 - Afternoon session

Change log

Last updated 16 April 2024

Back to top

Sign up for updates about this case

Sign up to receive email alerts when this case is updated.