Visit JCPCUKSC/2020/0022
•
DEVOLUTION
Sutherland (AP) (Appellant) v Her Majesty’s Advocate (Respondent) (Scotland)
Case summary
Case ID
UKSC/2020/0022
Parties
Appellant(s)
Mark Sutherland
Respondent(s)
Her Majesty's Advocate
Intervener(s)
Director of Public Prosecutions
Issue
Are prosecutions based on the covert sting operations of "paedophile hunters" compatible with the right to private life and correspondence?
Facts
This case is about how the authorities should approach the activities of "paedophile hunters". These are self-appointed groups of vigilantes who impersonate children in order to expose people who they consider to be sexual predators. Some of these groups have attracted substantial online followings and debate in mainstream media.In 2018 Mr Sutherland matched on a dating app with somebody who, when he communicated with them, claimed to be a 13-year old child. He sent sexual messages and images to that person, and they eventually arranged to meet at Partick station. In fact, he was speaking to an adult member of a "paedophile hunter" group. Members of that group confronted Mr Sutherland at the meeting point at the arranged time. They broadcast the encounter on social media and handed the evidence to the police. Mr Sutherland was convicted of attempting to communicate indecently with an older child and related offences. He appealed against his conviction on the basis that the covert investigation (and the use of the resulting evidence by the prosecuting authorities) breached his right to respect for his private life and correspondence under ECHR Article 8.
Date of issue
7 January 2020
Judgment details
Judgment date
15 July 2020
Neutral citation
[2020] UKSC 32
Judgment links
Judgment summary
15 July 2020
Appeal
Justices
Hearing dates
Start date
3 June 2020
End date
3 June 2020
Watch hearings
3 June 2020 - Morning session
3 June 2020 - Afternoon session
All videos on this page are recorded and transmitted in line with the Court's terms of use. These can be found here.. Please Note: Every effort is being made to provide a satisfactory streaming service of the Supreme Court judgments and hearings. However, these services may be subject to technical issues or delay, in which case we will attempt to resolve them as soon as possible.
Change log
Last updated 16 April 2024