UKSC/2019/0068

Royal Mail Group Ltd (Respondent) v Efobi (Appellant)

Judgment given

Case summary


Case ID

UKSC/2019/0068

Parties

Appellant(s)

Efobi

Respondent(s)

Royal Mail Group Ltd

Issue

In a claim for discrimination contrary to the Equality Act 2010, which party bears the burden of proving that discrimination has or has not occurred?

Facts

The appellant, Mr Efobi, is a black Nigerian and a citizen of the Republic of Ireland. He has graduate and postgraduate qualifications in information systems. From August 2013, he was employed by the respondent, Royal Mail Group Ltd ("RMG"). He worked as a postman in the operational department but wanted to be employed in the management/IT service area. He applied for many posts but was unsuccessful. He brought proceedings in the Employment Tribunal ("ET") for harassment, victimisation, and direct and indirect race discrimination in relation to his failure to obtain 22 of these posts. The ET rejected his claims of discrimination, but his harassment and victimisation claims succeeded in part. Mr Efobi successfully appealed the ET’s discrimination findings in the Employment Appeal Tribunal ("EAT"). The EAT concluded that the ET had erred in its approach to the burden of proof. RMG successfully appealed the EAT’s decision to the Court of Appeal. Mr Efobi now appeals to the Supreme Court.

Date of issue

29 March 2019

Judgment appealed

Judgment details


Judgment date

23 July 2021

Neutral citation

[2021] UKSC 33

Judgment summary

23 July 2021

Appeal


Justices

Hearing dates

Start date

27 April 2021

End date

27 April 2021

Watch hearings


27 April 2021 - Morning session

27 April 2021 - Afternoon session

Change log

Last updated 16 April 2024

Back to top

Sign up for updates about this case

Sign up to receive email alerts when this case is updated.