UKSC/2019/0011

Khan (Respondent) v Meadows (Appellant)

Judgment given

Case summary


Case ID

UKSC/2019/0011

Parties

Appellant(s)

Meadows

Respondent(s)

Khan

Issue

If a child born with more than one disability would not have been born but for a doctor's failure to advise of the risk of their being born with one of those disabilities, can the mother sue the doctor for the costs associated with all of the child's disabilities, or only for the costs associated with the disability the doctor was consulted on?

Facts

The appellant, Ms Meadows, is the mother of a child with haemophilia and autism. Before her pregnancy, Ms Meadows asked Dr Khan to establish whether she carried the haemophilia gene. Following blood tests, the mother was wrongly led to believe that any child she had would not have haemophilia. Had Ms Meadows known that she carried the haemophilia gene, she would have undergone foetal testing for haemophilia when she was pregnant. This would have revealed the foetus was affected. Ms Meadows would then have chosen to terminate her pregnancy, and her child would not have been born.Ms Meadows sought damages from Dr Khan based on wrongful birth. She argued that Dr Khan was liable for all the consequences of the pregnancy. Dr Khan admitted liability for the consequences of the child's haemophilia, but denied liability in relation to the autism.The High Court held that Ms Meadows was entitled to damages in relation to the costs of bringing up a child with haemophilia and that she was entitled to the additional costs in relation to her child’s autism, even though that was an unrelated condition.The Court of Appeal allowed Dr Khan’s appeal. Ms Meadows now appeals to the Supreme Court.

Date of issue

15 January 2019

Judgment appealed

Judgment details


Judgment date

18 June 2021

Neutral citation

[2021] UKSC 21

Judgment summary

18 June 2021

Appeal


Justices

Hearing dates

Start date

5 November 2020

End date

5 November 2020

Watch hearings


5 November 2020 - Morning session

Change log

Last updated 16 April 2024

Back to top

Sign up for updates about this case

Sign up to receive email alerts when this case is updated.