Visit JCPCUKSC/2018/0100
•
ARBITRATION
Halliburton Company (Appellant) v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (Formerly known as Ace Bermuda Insurance Ltd) (Respondent)
Case summary
Case ID
UKSC/2018/0100
Parties
Appellant(s)
Halliburton Company
Respondent(s)
Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (Formerly known as Ace Bermuda Insurance Ltd)
Issue
When should an arbitrator make disclosure of circumstances which may give rise to justifiable doubts as to his impartiality?
Facts
Halliburton Company ("Appellant") provided cementing and well monitoring services to BP in the Gulf of Mexico. Transocean Ltd also provided services to BP, including overlapping services to those provided by the Appellant. The Appellant entered into a liability policy with Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (Formerly known as Ace Bermuda Insurance Ltd) (the "Respondent"). Transocean Ltd was also insured with the Respondent.In 2010, there was an explosion and fire on an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico, the "Deepwater Horizon" oil spill. As a result, thousands of civil claims were brought against BP, Halliburton and Transocean. BP also claimed against Halliburton and Transocean.Following a trial in the US in which judgment was given apportioning blame between the parties, the Appellant concluded a settlement to agree the amount of damages. The Appellant sought to claim a proportion of this settlement under its insurance policy. The Respondent declined to pay the Appellant’s claim. Arbitration was commenced. Both parties selected their own arbitrator, but the parties were unable to agree the Chairman of the arbitration. This resulted in an application to the High Court. The result of which was that the Respondent’s first-choice candidate "M" was selected.The appeal arises out of the discovery by the Appellant in 2016 that subsequent to M’s appointment and without the Appellant’s knowledge, M had accepted appointment as an arbitrator in two other references both of which arose out of the same Deepwater Horizon incident (i) Transocean’s claim against the Respondent; and (ii) a nomination by another insurer to arbitrate another claim by Transocean arising out of the same incident.In December 2016, the Appellant applied to the court to remove M as arbitrator. That application was refused.
Date of issue
16 May 2018
Judgment appealed
Judgment details
Judgment date
27 November 2020
Neutral citation
[2020] UKSC 48
Judgment links
Judgment summary
27 November 2020
All videos on this page are recorded and transmitted in line with the Court's terms of use. These can be found here.. Please Note: Every effort is being made to provide a satisfactory streaming service of the Supreme Court judgments and hearings. However, these services may be subject to technical issues or delay, in which case we will attempt to resolve them as soon as possible.
Appeal
Justices
Hearing dates
Full hearing
Start date
12 November 2019
End date
13 November 2019
Change log
Last updated 16 April 2024